Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Outlaw

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 8, 1996No. 2 CA-CV 96-0045PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Presiding Judge.

Defendants/appellants James and Cleopatra Outlaw, their son Andrew Outlaw, and the Church of Jesus appeal from jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs/appellees Rose Mary Martinez-Barnes, Naomi Martinez Outlaw, and Isaac Martinez on their claims for damages resulting from counseling mal practice, breach of fiduciary duty, false light invasion of privacy, invasion of privacy and defamation, and James Barnes’s claim for loss of consortium. Appellants challenge the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction and also argue that the court erred in instructing the jury…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Reed v. Real Detective Publishing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Schmidt v. BishopDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barnes v. OutlawArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Powers v. Taser International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. STATE FARM FIRE & CAS. IN. CO. v. GrabowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Dobrota v. Free Serbian Orthodox ChurchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance v. GrabowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API