Maten v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MIRABAL, Justice.
A jury found appellant, Jermaine Charles Maten, guilty of capital murder. The State did not seek the death penalty. The trial court assessed punishment at confinement for life. We affirm.
In his first point of error, appellant asserts the trial court committed reversible error in impaneling only 11 jurors to hear his trial, because, under Texas law, 12 jurors constitute a jury.
Appellant’s venire panel was assembled on a Friday. At the end of thé day, 12 venire-persons were selected to serve as the jury. The judge identified the jurors by name and number. He then…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hatch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Shaffer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Garner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Hegar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- Castro v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.