Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Police Officers Labor Council

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1998No. 106159, Calendar No. 18PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

We granted leave in this case to determine whether the Police Officers Labor Council or the Police Officers Association of Michigan (poam) has the responsibility to pursue a grievance filed by plaintiff Quinn, who was discharged by the Port Huron Police Department. The Michigan Employment Relations Commission determined that the Labor Council was responsible for processing plaintiff’s grievance. However, the Court of Appeals reversed the merc’s decision and held that the poam, the newly certified union, had the duty to continue Quinn’s representation. We reverse the decision of the Court of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Port Huron Education Ass'n v. Port Huron Area School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Adcox v. Teledyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Demings v. City of EcorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Gibraltar School District v. Gibraltar Mespa-TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Local 368, United Federation of Engineers, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Western Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Qis, Inc. v. Industrial Quality Control, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. QIS, INC. v. Industrial Quality Control, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Technical Prof and Officeworkers Assn of Mi v. Daniel Lee RennerMichigan Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API