Legal Opinion

Qis, Inc. v. Industrial Quality Control, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 2004No. Docket No. 246486PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Plaintiff appeals by leave granted from the trial court’s order granting defendants’ summary disposition motion. We affirm. This case arose when a manager for plaintiff called together certain union employees, the individual defendants1 here, and informed them that he would withhold their paychecks until they either signed a noncompete agreement or refused. The manager also explained that refusal would result in termination. The defendants signed the agreement. After they stopped working for plaintiff, however, they arguably violated the written agreement by starting a new business, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartley v. Brotherhood of RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Robert Half International, Inc. v. Van SteenisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
  3. Quinn v. Police Officers Labor CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Michigan Claim Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  2. QIS, INC. v. Industrial Quality Control, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Qis, Inc. v. Industrial Quality Control, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API