Legal Opinion

Rathmell v. Wesleyville Borough

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1943No. Appeal, 11PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

The compensation authorities and the court below sustained the employe’s claim. His employer’s argument on its appeal states only one question: Did the claimant suffer an injury by an accident in the course of his employment within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act?

Claimant was a part-time policeman for the Borough of Wesleyville and was otherwise employed by the General Electric Company at its Erie plant. On March 7, 1940, he was directed by the burgess to escort the funeral of the president of the borough council to the cemetery at North East, a distance of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Parks v. Miller Printing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Good v. Pennsylvania Department of Property & SuppliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Royko v. Logan Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gavula v. Sims Company.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Rathmell v. Wesleyville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API