Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Universal Constructors, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 12, 1971No. 717PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
In this workmen’s compensation case, the trial court found that plaintiff “ * * has no disability which is a natural and direct result of the accident. * * * ” Section 59-10-13.3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 9, pt. 1). Plaintiff’s appeal: (1) challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support this finding and (2) contends this court should weigh the evidence and make our own determination as to disability.
Sufficiency of the evidence.
Plaintiff claims the uncontroverted medical evidence establishes that plaintiff is disabled, to some extent, as the result of his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ross v. Sayers Well Servicing CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Los Alamos Medical Center, Inc. v. CoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Newman v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Gallegos v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Hamilton v. DotyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tallman v. ABF (Arkansas Best Freight)New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Banks v. IMC Kalium Carlsbad Potash Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- First National Bank v. Energy Equities Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Gearhart v. Eidson Metal ProductsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Thigpen v. County of ValenciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.