Schuler v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Thomas C. Hennings, Judge. (1) The court erred in admitting sec. 58, vol. 3 of the Laws of the State of New York requiring the application to he endorsed upon or attached to the policy when issued. The policy in suit was issued and delivered in Missouri and therefore the laws of this State govern. Whittaker v. Insurance Co., 138 Mo. App. 664; Haven v. Insurance Co., 149 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Thomas C. Hennings, Judge. (1) The court erred in admitting sec. 58, vol. 3 of the Laws of the State of New York requiring the application to he endorsed upon or attached to the policy when issued. The policy in suit was issued and delivered in Missouri and therefore the laws of this State govern. Whittaker v. Insurance Co., 138 Mo. App. 664; Haven v. Insurance Co., 149 Mo. App. 291. (2) It was error for the court not to allow Dr. Haase, the examining physician, to answer the following questions : “I will ask you to state to the jury whether or…
1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, P. J.
Action on two policies of insurance, one a twenty-year endowment policy for $500, dated July 24, 1908, the other an industrial policy for $75, the policy dated July 6, 1908. Both policies were in favor of plaintiff, respondent here, and issued on the life of his wife, it being averred that the company issuing the policies was organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York and authorized to transact business in this State as a life insurance company. It is averred that after the issue of the policy on July 24, 1908, by agreement between the parties, on August…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- James v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Cravens v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Carroll v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Horton v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Eagle Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. Hico Oil MillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Banks v. Clover Leaf Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1921
- Hicks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
- Bruck v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.