Legal Opinion

Carroll v. United Railways Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1911PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Virgil Rule, Judge. (1) The court erred in overruling defendant’s challenge for cause to juror, William Klasek, on Ms voir dire, on the ground that said juror wasprejudiced against defendant. Heidbrink v. United Railways, 133 Mo. App. 40; Theobold v. Transit Co., 191 Mo. 428. (2) The court erred in overruling defendant’s demurrers to the evidence.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Virgil Rule, Judge. (1) The court erred in overruling defendant’s challenge for cause to juror, William Klasek, on Ms voir dire, on the ground that said juror wasprejudiced against defendant. Heidbrink v. United Railways, 133 Mo. App. 40; Theobold v. Transit Co., 191 Mo. 428. (2) The court erred in overruling defendant’s demurrers to the evidence. First: Because the evidence fails to disclose any mutual mistake of fact or any false or fraudulent representation was made by defendant. Second: Because the evidence shows that no representation was…

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, P. J.

— Action by plaintiff for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her in the city of St. Louis, on the’25th of November, 1904, while alighting from a street car on which she was a passenger, the car and the line upon which it was run*257uing being at tbe time operated by defendant. The action was instituted November 15, 1905. Averring that her occupation was that of a trained nurse and that as a result of her fall from the car she was severely and permanently injured and prevented from pursuing her avocation, plaintiff demands damages in the sum of six thousand dollars:

The…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Och v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Black River Lumber Co. v. WarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  3. Lynn v. HookadaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Theobald v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Scholfield Gear & Pulley Co. v. ScholfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Moore v. Middlewest Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Freeman v. BerberichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Moss v. Mindlin's, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. J. E. Blank, Inc. v. Lennox Land Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API