Legal Opinion
Hagmaier v. Cooley (In re Cooley)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 12, 2016No. Case No. 15-10555-SAH; Adv. Pro. 15-01214-SAHPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Sarah A Hall, United States Bankruptcy Judge
After considering the pleadings filed, the stipulations contained in the Joint Final *500Pretrial Order [Doe.28], and the evidence and testimony presented at the trial held on March 28, 2016, the Court adopts the following as its findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 7052 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY.
To a degree, this case is “an unfortunate tale of poor lawyering.” Smith v. McCord, 707 F.3d 1161, 1162 (10th Cir.2013). Plaintiff Stacey Hagmaier (“Hagmaier”)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Panalis v. Moore (In Re Moore)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc. v. Longley (In Re Longley)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- In Re ShebelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burris v. Burris (In re Burris)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
- Grassmann v. Brown (In re Brown)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2017
- Gerlich v. BarwickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021
- M. v. RandlettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2022
- Oil States Industries, Inc v. NambakamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.