Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Payne

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1922No. 6409PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Milam County Court; W. G. Gillis, Judge. Action by Mrs. Era Cobb and husband against Walker D. Hines, Director General of Railroads, in which John Barton Payne, Agent, was substituted as party defendant. From a judgment dismissing the suit, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Mrs. Era Cobb, joined pro forma by her husband, filed her original petition March 9, 1920, against Walker D. Hines, Director General of Railroads, in an action to recover damages for injuries to her automobile. The collision occurred at a crossing on the line of the Gulf, Colorado Santa Fé Railway Company, on March 14, 1918, while such railroad was being operated and controlled by the government. No citation was issued upon this petition.

On April 5, 1920, an amended petition was filed in which John Barton Payne, Agent, was made the defendant. To these pleadings, the defendant John Barton…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Connell v. NickeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Hines v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Godshalk v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Muir v. Louisville & N. R.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1918
  5. Ellerd v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. HaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API