Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Goldsmith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 1923No. 12455Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

The parties will bp referred to as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff filed this! action in the district court of Grant county, on the 25th of October, 1920, alleging that on the 24th of November, 1919, he entered into a livestock Shipping contract with the defendant, by which plaintiff was to ship and the defendant receive and carry, as a common carrier, a certain carload of mules, from Pond Creek, Okla., to Fort Worth, Tex.; and -that under such contract he delivered and defendant received one certain mule of the value of $325,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Mardis v. HinesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1919
  3. Nash v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1919
  4. Commonwealth v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API