Legal Opinion
Moultry v. City of Poughkeepsie
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 1, 2001No. 00 CIV. 6967(CM)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
McMAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kevin Moultry sues defendants City of Poughkeepsie (“the City”), and police officers Matthew Notaro, “John” Digi-lio, and “John” Mulvey, in their individual capacities, for false arrest and imprisonment, malicious abuse of process, and excessive force, in violation of his constitutional rights as secured by 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Plaintiff has withdrawn his claims against defendant Mulvey. The remaining defendants move for summary judgment.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
At approximately 2:55 a.m. on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brogdon v. City of New RochelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Eiden v. McCarthyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Lange v. Town of MonroeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Fridman v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Alvarez v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.