Legal Opinion · Dissent

Epley v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1937No. 26064. En BancPublished

1DissentTolman, J.

(dissenting) — As stated in the prevailing opinion, the claim in this case is predicated on Rem. Rev. Stat., § 7679 [P. C. § 3472] (a) (1), which reads as follows:

“If the workman leaves a widow or invalid widower, a monthly payment of thirty-five dollars ($35.00) shall be made throughout the life of the surviving spouse, to cease at the end of the month in which remarriage shall occur, and the surviving spouse shall also receive per month for each child of the deceased under the age of sixteen years at the time any monthly payment is due the following payments: For the youngest or only child…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Peet v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. MeeseSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Robinson v. McHughWashington Supreme Court · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API