Legal Opinion

Sachs v. Goldberg

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 6, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPleasants, C. J.

This suit was brought by appellant against the appellee to recover an undivided one-half interest in lot No. 1, block No.' 138, in the city of Port Arthur.

In addition to the usual allegations in a suit of trespass to try title, plaintiff’s petition alleges, in substance, that on May 14, 1910, plaintiff and defendant became joint owners by purchase of a building situated on the lot before described and are now the joint owners of said building; that soon after the purchase of said building “plaintiff and defendant made and entered into a certain agreement, whereby it was agreed that plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Gardner v. RundellTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Lucia v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Smith v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lester v. HutsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. City of Dallas v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Ellerd v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Galbreath v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. McBride v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API