Legal Opinion

Buysse v. Jones

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 2017No. COA17-419PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TYSON, Judge.

*429 Adam and Susan Jones ("Defendants") appeal from an order granting Bob Buysse, Joan Guilkey, and Mike Miles ("Plaintiffs") specific performance of the restrictive covenants of the Gimghoul Neighborhood, requiring Defendants to remove the portion of their front porch addition that protrudes into a purported forty-foot setback from Gimghoul Road and a permanent injunction. We reverse and remand.

I. Background

A. The Restrictive Covenants

In 1923, The Junior Order of Gimghouls owned and endeavored to develop a tract of land into a residential neighborhood, later known as *430 the Gimghoul…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Walton v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. J. T. Hobby & Son, Inc. v. Family Homes of Wake County, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Turner v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Callaham v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Hemric v. GroceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alston v. JacoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API