Legal Opinion

– State v. Harris –

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 13, 2019No. 112883PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 112,883 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. SAMUEL L. HARRIS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The "taking or confining" element for the crime of kidnapping under K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 21-5408 is satisfied if the purpose of the taking or confining was to "facilitate" the commission of another crime. The term "facilitate" means something more than to just make the crime's commission more convenient. The taking or confining must have some significant bearing on making the other crime's commission easier. 2. To constitute a kidnapping under K.S.A. 2018…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. State v. PlummerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. BuggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. DouglasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  2. State v. HillardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. State v. CraigSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  4. State v. LemmieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  5. State v. ZeinerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API