In re D.A.C.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
Juvenile D.A.C. appeals from orders adjudicating him to be a delinquent juvenile based on a determination that he had committed the offenses of injury to personal and real property and placing him on juvenile probation subject to certain terms and conditions. On appeal, Juvenile contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress an inculpatory statement which he alleges to have been obtained as the result of a violation of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966), and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-2101. After careful…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PortilloCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- In re E.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In re E.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In re: D.A.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- In re: J.D.F.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021