Legal Opinion

Stapp v. Godfrey

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 11, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Keokuk District Court. — Hon. B. W. Preston, Judge. Action to recover a commission for finding a purchaser of certain real estate belonging to defendant. Defendant denied that he authorized plaintiffs to find a purchaser, admitted that he executed a contract for exchange of properties with one Kaufman, and further averred that plaintiffs, without his knowledge or consent, obtained a commission from Kaufman for effectuating the exchange.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Keokuk District Court. — Hon. B. W. Preston, Judge. Action to recover a commission for finding a purchaser of certain real estate belonging to defendant. Defendant denied that he authorized plaintiffs to find a purchaser, admitted that he executed a contract for exchange of properties with one Kaufman, and further averred that plaintiffs, without his knowledge or consent, obtained a commission from Kaufman for effectuating the exchange. Plaintiffs, in reply, admitted that they received a commission from Kaufman, but averred that this was with the full knowledge of defendant and…

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

The issues as made by the pleadings were: First. Did plaintiffs and defendant enter into an agreement whereby defendant was to allow plaintiffs a commission for the sale of his real estate? Second. Admitting that plaintiffs received a commission from the purchaser Kaufman, did defendant know of that fact before the sale was consummated ? Third. If plaintiffs are entitled to recover, what is the measure of their recovery?

The verdict was general, and, as there was a conflict in the testimony upon each of the propositions involved, the ease must be affirmed, unless it appears that errors were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rice v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Stewart v. MatherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Scribner v. CollarMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Leathers v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Orton v. ScofieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boyle v. BornholtzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  2. Murphy v. Albany Pecan Development Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Clopton v. MeevesIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Rasmussen v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Githens v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API