Legal Opinion

Githens v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 6, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Grape, J.

This is an action to recover damages predicated on the fraudulent acts of the defendants as agents of the plaintiffs in the sale of plaintiffs’ farm. There is no substantial conflict in the testimony. It appears that the plaintiffs owned a farm of 142 acres in Wapello County, Iowa. The defendant Johnson was authorized to sell the farm and “was to get the best price he could, but not less than $110 per acre.” Later Johnson associated with him as a realtor the defendant Baker.

On the morning of August 8, 1919 Johnson and Baker met C. W. and F. W. Peterson on the road near the farm in question.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haswell v. StandringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Holmes v. CathcartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Stapp v. GodfreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Bracken v. JacksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Stoner v. WeiserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vertman v. DraytonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  2. Jones v. SearsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Loots v. KnokeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. Watts v. Farmers National Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API