Legal Opinion
United States v. Soltero
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 19, 2007No. 06-50257PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM Opinion; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge HAWKINS.
2Per curiam
Dean Harlon Soltero (“Soltero”) appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He argues that the district court erred by failing to verify that he had read his presentence report (“PSR”) and had discussed it with his attorney, as well as by imposing three particular conditions of supervised release. We affirm in part, and vacate and remand in part.
I
Soltero1 pleaded guilty to a single-count indictment charging him with being a…
3Cases cited26 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Robert BolingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ray Donald LoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Matthew Eugene DupasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. SolteroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Lopez-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Lopez-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. SolteroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. SolteroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.