Woodhouse v. Budwesky
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill in equity for lack of jurisdiction, on the ground that there was not the required diversity of citizenship and no federal question was involved. We think that this decree was clearly right and that contention to the contrary is frivolous. The bill alleged that complainant was a citizen and resident of New York and that three of the defendants were citizens and residents of that state. This was clearly fatal to jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 3 Cranch, 267, 2 L. Ed. 435; Case of the Sewing Machine…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Williams v. NottawaSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Ellenwood v. Marietta Chair Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sinchak v. ParenteDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- William Dinneen v. Robert E. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Jefferson v. Ametek, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- McGrier v. P. Ballantine & SonsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
- Clark v. InouyeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.