Legal Opinion

Voisinet v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1988No. 87CA1527PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUME, Judge.

Donald M. Voisinet, claimant, seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which disqualified him from the receipt of unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.

Claimant contends the Panel erred in not considering the supplemental evidence he tendered on appeal. We disagree.

Section 8-74-104(2), C.R.S. (1986 Repl. Vol. 3B) authorizes the Panel to review a hearing officer’s decision. Claimant correctly asserts that prior to the repeal and reenactment of § 8-74-104, C.R.S., in 1986, when the General Assembly replaced the Industrial Commission with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.M., a Child, and concerning C.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Miller International, Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. Larsen-Oldaker v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Samaritan Institute v. Prince-WalkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Ortega v. INDUS. CLAIM APPEALS OFF. OF STATEColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Alfaro v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API