Legal Opinion
Samaritan Institute v. Prince-Walker
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 11, 1994No. 93SC705PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
We granted certiorari to review Prince-Walker v. Industrial Claim App. Office, 870 P.2d 588 (Colo.App.1993), and to resolve two questions:
1. Whether the court of appeals properly interpreted the phrase “operated primarily for religious purposes,” in section 8-70-140(l)(a), 3B C.R.S. (1993 Supp.)....
2. Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel (Panel) exceeded its authority by improperly substituting its evidentiary findings for those of the referee.
Our answer to the first question is yes. Our answer to the second question is no. Accord ingly, we…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Malat v. RiddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- St. Martin Evangelical Lutheran Church v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lee v. State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Scoggins v. Unigard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Western Fire Truck, Inc. v. Emergency One, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Renteria v. Department of Labor & EmploymentColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2024
- Velo v. Employment Solutions PersonnelColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado v. City of PuebloColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.