Legal Opinion

Erone Corporation v. SKOURAS THEATRES CORPORATION

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 5, 1957PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASHIN, District Judge.

Two separate sets of defendants herein, prior to answer, move against a “Further Amended Complaint” on various grounds. Because of the numerous grounds for the motion and their interrelation, each will be considered separately after a summary of the relevant facts as alleged in the further amended complaint.

Plaintiffs all seek to recover treble damages and injunctive relief under the anti-trust laws. Five of the plaintiffs have been, for varying periods of times covered by the complaint, the owners of five different theatres and lessors thereof on a minimum rental plus…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Productive Inventions, Inc., a Corporation v. Trico Products Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Harrison v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Congress Building Corporation v. Loew's, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  4. Melrose Realty Co. v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. Erone Corp. v. Skouras Theatres Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hoffman Motors Corporation v. Alfa Romeo SpADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  2. Molinas v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. State of Washington v. American Pipe & Construction Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1968
  4. VTR, INCORPORATED v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. Erone Corp. v. Skouras Theatres Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API