Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Cullen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1915No. 19,652PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Leavenworth district court; William I. Stuart, judge pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

DAWSON, J.:

This is a case of considerable complexity, but thanks to the comprehensive statement of Mr. Justice West when it was here before (Ryan v. Cullen, 89 Kan. 879, 138 Pac. 430), it will require no extended recital now. The litigation grows out of the estate of Matthew Ryan, sr., a Leavenworth citizen of considerable property who died in 1893 leaving six children, Matthew, jr., Kate, Mary, Thomas, Jeptha and Ethan. One provision of the will of Ryan, sr., reads:

“5. I give and bequeath to my children, Matthew Ryan, Jr., Kate V. Sheedy, Jeptha D.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. CliftonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. McCullough's Adm'r v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  3. Rutledge v. CramptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Silvers v. CanaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Cramton v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Markham v. WatermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Windscheffel v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Somers v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Wallace v. MagieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. Wallace v. MagieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API