Legal Opinion

Windscheffel v. Wright

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 4, 1961No. 42,049 and 42,050PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

The appellees, who are the special administrator of the estate of Charles M. Post, deceased, and thirteen of the remaindermen designated in the decedent’s will, commenced this action in the district court of Smith County to set aside certain deeds executed by Evaline Post Wright, the life tenant, and by her husband, S. J. Wright, upon the theory that the conveyances were violative of the power of sale given the life tenant and constituted a fraud upon the remaindermen. Six other remaindermen were named defendants but since they joined with…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Lindholm v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. Frazier v. JeakinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Staab v. StaabSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  5. Olson v. WeberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Frame, Administrator v. BaumanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Baldwin v. HambletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. In Re Estate of ZimmermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. Lehner v. Estate of LehnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Gorham State Bank v. SellensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API