Legal Opinion

Silvers v. Canary

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1887No. 12,582PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Sullivan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellee brought this action to quiet title to real estate of which she claimed to be the owner.

The appellants answered in three paragraphs, the first of which is the general denial. The reply of the appellee is ■addressed to the entire answer, and purports to be a reply to *268all of that pleading. It is, in fact, not sufficient as to the* first paragraph of the answer. It is a familiar rule of pleading that a reply must be good as to the entire answer to which it is addressed or it will be bad on demurrer. This rule makes it plain that the trial court erred in overruling the appellants’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. MiddlesworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. VanGorder v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. South v. SouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Downie v. BuennagelIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mulvane v. RudeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Feegles v. SlaughterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Herring v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Bowser v. MattlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Rinkenberger v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API