Summit v. Ellett
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Monroe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
— This was a suit for partition. The first paragraph of the complaint was dismissed. The second para*228graph averred that the plaintiff, on the 8th of February, 1877, had a wife living and owned the land in controversy; that, on said day, he, by a mortgage, in which his wife did not join, conveyed the land to the defendant; that afterwards said mortgage was foreclosed against the plaintiff only; that at the foreclosure sale, on the 10th of August, 1878, the defendant became the purchaser of the land, and has since received the sheriff’s deed therefor; that before the expiration of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taylor v. StockwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Elliott v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Hollenback v. BlackmoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Riley v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by11 opinions
- Currier v. ElliotIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Elliott v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Pouder v. RitzingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Buser v. ShepardIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Vandevender v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.