Legal Opinion

Summit v. Ellett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 8298PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

— This was a suit for partition. The first paragraph of the complaint was dismissed. The second para*228graph averred that the plaintiff, on the 8th of February, 1877, had a wife living and owned the land in controversy; that, on said day, he, by a mortgage, in which his wife did not join, conveyed the land to the defendant; that afterwards said mortgage was foreclosed against the plaintiff only; that at the foreclosure sale, on the 10th of August, 1878, the defendant became the purchaser of the land, and has since received the sheriff’s deed therefor; that before the expiration of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StockwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Elliott v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Hollenback v. BlackmoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Riley v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Currier v. ElliotIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Elliott v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Pouder v. RitzingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Buser v. ShepardIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Vandevender v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API