Legal Opinion

Hollenback v. Blackmore

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1880PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— This was a suit by the appellees, against the appellant, for the partition of certain real estate in Clinton county, Indiana. In their complaint, the appellees alleged, in substance, that the said Josephine Blackmore was the owner in fee-simple of the undivided one-third part, and that the appellant was the owner in fee of the undivided two-thirds part, of said real estate; and she demanded judgment for partition, that her share of said real estate should be set off to her in severalty, and for all other proper relief. To this complaint the appellant answered by a general denial.

The issues…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steeple v. DowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Bellows v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Ashley v. EbertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Sumner v. ColemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Elliott v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Davis v. NewcombIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Elliott v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Emmons v. HardingIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Summit v. EllettIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API