Legal Opinion

State v. Skipintheday

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 27, 2005No. A04-1293PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON W. SHUMAKER, Judge.

Appellant challenges his sentence on three counts of being an accomplice after the fact. Appellant argues that there were not multiple victims of his three offenses, even if there were multiple victims for the offenses committed by the principals, and that because the conduct was part of a single behavioral incident, appellant could be sentenced on only one count. Because we hold that the victims of the principal offenses are not victims of appellant’s crimes, the single-behavioral-incident rule applies and appellant can receive only one sentence for his three…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. State v. SchmitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. State v. LejaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. State v. SullivanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SkipinthedaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. MorinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  3. State v. FranksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API