Fehr v. Haworth
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, for Ada County. Hón. Carl A. Davis, Judge. Action for rescission of contract. Judgment for defendants.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, for Ada County. Hón. Carl A. Davis, Judge. Action for rescission of contract. Judgment for defendants. The court should have found on the question of the value of the merchandise; the condition of the trade; as to its being prosperous or otherwise; the question as to whether or not plaintiffs were skilled or schooled in the business involved; upon the question as to whether or not defendants made the alleged representations; as to whether they were relied on by plaintiffs; and as to whether or not such reliance was an inducing…
1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.
This is an action to rescind a certain contract of sale of the goods and business comprising what was known as the Needlecraft Shop. Appellants allege that they were induced to enter into the contract by reason of certain false *98and fraudulent representations on the part of respondent C. L. Haworth and his intestate.
Appellants specify as error the failure of the court to find upon, all the material issues presented by the pleadings. The findings of the court are defective, in-that they consist largely of inferences and conclusions of fact rather than specific findings of fact. Findings of fact…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Donaldson v. DonaldsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Fouch v. BatesIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gould v. HillIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Reynolds Irr. Dist. v. SproatIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Marysville Development Co. v. HargisIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Cazier v. Economy Cash Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Dickey v. ClarkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.