Legal Opinion
In Re Harned
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 20, 1994No. 19-10586PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Chief Judge.
A INTRODUCTION
Before this court is the Objection (“the Objection”) of FRANCES D. HARNED (“the Debtor”) to the amended proof of claim (“the Claim”) filed by Boulevard Mortgage Company (“Boulevard”), the mortgagee of the Debtor’s home. The Objection calls into question the important issue of the proper interest rate which must be paid on home-mortgage arrearages which a debtor seeks to cure in a Chapter 13 plan. Although the Supreme Court, in Rake v. Wade, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2187, 124 L.Ed.2d 424 (1993), concluded that an oversecured creditor was indeed…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rake v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- 26 Collier bankr.cas.2d 663, Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,447 in Re Allegheny International, Inc. J. Daniel SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Alphonso Jones, Debtor, Robert M. Wood, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- In Re SimpkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re LewisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1994
- Matter of ArveloUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Winston v. Chrysler Financial Corp. (In Re Winston)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- In Re HardwareUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- In Re MorganUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998