Legal Opinion

Winston v. Chrysler Financial Corp. (In Re Winston)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1999No. 19-11231PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.

A INTRODUCTION

The instant proceeding (“the Proceeding”), initiated by CORINTHIAN V. WINSTON (“the Debtor”), requires us to appropriately bifurcate the secured claim of CHRYSLER FINANCIAL CORPORATION (“Chrysler”) in this case. Applying the principles set forth in Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash, 520 U.S. 953, 117 S.Ct. 1879, 138 L.Ed.2d 148 (1997), to value the Debtor’s 1993 Dodge Caravan Minivan (“the Car”), we eschew adoption of a formula and fix the value at $6,000, somewhat more than the Debtor’s lay testimony and somewhat less than Chrysler’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Associates Commercial Corp. v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Alphonso Jones, Debtor, Robert M. Wood, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Kinter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  4. In Re JablonskiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. In Re HowellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re GonzalezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  2. In Re BernardesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  3. In Re SCHWALBUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2006
  4. In Re GonchUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2010
  5. Reed v. Norwest Mortgage, Inc. (In Re Reed)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API