Adams v. Crook
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
Plaintiff brought suit in equity to establish a right f way by either prescriptive or implied easement cross defendants’ property. The trial court found an nplied easement and plaintiff appeals, citing as error re trial court’s limitation of the easement to agricul-iral use. Defendants cross appeal, citing as error the ’iai court’s granting of the easement. We affirm.
The record includes a drawing of the disputed por-on of the roadway in question and some aerial photo-raphs of the area, but no map depicting all of the jrvient properties and their location in relation to one oother. Because we…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cheney v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Jack v. HUNT ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Winter v. SatchellOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Firebaugh v. BoringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stroda v. Joice Holdings, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Liles v. WeddingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Long v. SendelbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982