Legal Opinion

Redstone v. Signore

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided December 8, 1995No. 924190PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSosman, J.

Plaintiffs Edward and Sumner Redstone have brought the present action alleging that gasoline and hazardous materials released from the defendants’ properly have contaminated the plaintiffs’ property. Defendants Luigi F. Signore, John R. Signore, Vincent J. Signore, Sr., Frank A. Signore, and Domenica Visco, the owners of the abutting property, have moved for judgment on the pleadings with respect to plaintiffs’ claims for future response costs and plaintiffs’ claims under G.L.c. 93A, §11. For thefollow-ing reasons, defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is ALLOWED with respect to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sheehy v. Lipton Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  2. Garweth Corp. v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Wellesley Hills Realty Trust v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
  4. Minaya v. Massachusetts Credit Union Share Ins. Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Town of Burlington v. District Attorney for the Northern DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. Homart Development Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API