Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Homart Development Co.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided February 26, 1997No. 952280BPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfer, J.

INTRODUCTION

The present action arises out of the dumping of construction debris containing vinyl asbestos tile at *518Ternberry Estates, a residential development in Shrewsbury, in violation of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. Homart Development Corporation, which generated the debris in the course of demolishing and redeveloping the Natick Mall, entered into a Consent Judgment with the Commonwealth and paid a $200,000 civil penalty. Homart now seeks indemnification and/or contribution in that amount plus the amount expended to clean up the property, as well as damages for an alleged violation of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Spinner v. NuttMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Abington Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Arthur Araujo v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard, Nantucket Steamship Authority v. New England Telephone Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. JEMS of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API