Legal Opinion

Bollwerk v. Susquehanna Corp.

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided January 27, 1993No. Civ. 91-5142PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BATTEY, District Judge.

Pending is defendant’s motion for summary'judgment (Docket # 26); defendant’s motion for an order to determine the sufficiency of plaintiffs’ responses to defendant’s first request for admissions (Docket # 30); plaintiffs’ motion to compel production of documents and for an in camera review of documents (Docket # 35); and plaintiffs’- motion to require defendant to submit a Vaughn Index (Docket # 38). Upon review of the record the Court finds that summary judgment for the defendant is in order; therefore,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. RossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Crow v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2021
  3. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. RossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Tang v. Northpole Ltd.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API