Legal Opinion

Tang v. Northpole Ltd.

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided April 29, 2016No. CASE NO. 5:11-CV-05112Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are Plaintiff Larry Tang’s Amended Motion for Joinder (Doc. 147) and Brief in Support (Doc. 148), Defendant Tofasco of America, Ine.’s (“Tofasco”) Response in Opposition (Doe. 158), Tang’s Motion to Strike (Doc. 160) and Brief in Support (Doc. 161), and Tofasco’s Response in Opposition (Doc. 162). For the reasons stated herein, Tang’s Motion for Joinder is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Tang’s Motion to Strike is DENIED AS MOOT.

I. BACKGROUND

This is a patent infringement case involving a patented…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  2. Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. In Re Ozark Restaurant Equipment Co., Inc. James G. Mixon, Trustee v. Bruce Anderson, Elmer Dale Yancey, Kenneth Eads, Robert Whiteley and Anderson Cajun's Wharf, James G. Mixon, Trustee v. Anderson Cajun's Wharf, James G. Mixon, Trustee v. Ed Yancey, Bruce Anderson and Kenneth EadsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. William A. Epps and Leslie A. Epps, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Stewart Information Services Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API