Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Cincinnati v. Correll

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1943No. 29230Published

1DissentZimmerman, J.

Granting there may be persuasive arguments on the other side of the question, we can discern no good or sufficient reason why the case of Wilson v. City of Zanesville, 130 Ohio St., 286, 199 N. E., 187, decided in 1935, should now bo disturbed.

In sustaining the validity of the Zanesville ordinance prescribing closing hours for barber shops, which ordinance is similar to that presently under examination, Judge Williams pointed out clearly and logically in his opinion that such ordinance was not unreasonable, had a real and substantial relation to public health, morals and safety, was a valid…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. GrosjeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Wilson v. City of ZanesvilleOhio Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API