Legal Opinion

E. E. Thomas Fruit Co. v. Start

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1895No. 15840PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Britt, C.

Plaintiff, a corporation, brought this action to recover of defendants the sum of six hundred and three dollars and ninety cents, claimed to be due from them as the compensation they had promised to pay plaintiff for drying a quantity of prunes—something over eighty-six tons—at the agreed rate of seven dollars per ton. Regarding its own undertaking, plaintiff, in its complaint, alleged merely that it agreed to dry the prunes for defendants, without specifying the degree of care or skill it should employ for that purpose. Defendants in their answer averred that plaintiff contracted to…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dahl-Beck Electric Co. v. RoggeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Holloway v. EvansNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. People v. IhmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Hickman v. FreiermuthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API