Legal Opinion
CHO v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 19, 2024No. 2:19-cv-19886Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY YOUNG CHO, Individually and as Representative of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, and on Behalf of the PRUDENTIAL EMPLOYEE SAVINGS 401(k) PLAN, Civil Action No. 19-19886 Plaintiff, OPINION v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY December 19, 2024 OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. SEMPER, District Judge. This putative class action, brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), arises out of allegations that fiduciaries of the Prudential Employee Savings Plan breached their fiduciary duties.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.