State v. Mabuti
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LUM, C J.
This court is called upon to examine the separate appeals of two co-defendants who were jointly tried; both were convicted of murder. In these appeals, Appellant Joefrey Mabuti and Appellant Vicente Acosta argue that a mistrial should have been declared when potentially prejudicial, non-evidentiary matters were allegedly injected into jury deliberations. Next they argue that newly discovered evidence justified granting a new trial. Finally, they argue that they should have been tried separately. As we see no abuse of discretion in the rulings by the trial court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. McNultyHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Wong v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. LarueHawaii Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HornHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. YoshinoHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. SamonteHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ChristianHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. AhloHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. OughtersonHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- Buff v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.