Legal Opinion
United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 18, 1996No. CV-D-90-190-PMPPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PRO, Distinct Judge.
Under the terms of the decree entered in United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co., 503 F.Supp. 877 (D.Nev.1980), Aqueduct I Ltd. (“Aqueduct”) timely appeals from the Nevada State Engineer’s Ruling # 4207 (“Ruling #4207”) which granted, subject to conditions, Change Applications for water usage filed by Aqueduct. For the reasons that follow, the Court affirms the decision of the State Engineer.
I. Factual and Procedural History
In 1989, Aqueduct I Ltd. (“Aqueduct”) purchased from Fred H. Dressier several acres of land in Alpine County, California and Douglas…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Application of FilippiniNevada Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Albuquerque v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1980
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Town of Eureka v. Office of the State EngineerNevada Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Alpine Land and Reservoir Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1998
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2569, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3352Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.