Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Hartville Milling Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 2000No. 22445, 22446PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.

This is an appeal by Hartville Milling Company (Hartville) and a cross-appeal by Thomas Sanders and Helen Sanders (collectively referred to as plaintiffs). For briefing purposes, plaintiffs are designated appellants and Hartville and Cargill-Nu-trena (Cargill) are designated respondents. See Rule 84.04(k).

Judgment was entered in accordance with a jury verdict for plaintiffs against Hartville on claims for product liability for defective dairy cattle feed (Count I) and negligence (Count IV). Judgment was entered for Hartville, pursuant to its motion for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Anglim v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Pierce v. Platte-Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. Richardson v. State Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. Emery v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Whitnell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Strong v. American Cyanamid Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Trimble v. PracnaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Williams v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Marmaduke v. CBL & Associates Management, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API