Legal Opinion

Weiland v. Paulin

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 13, 2002No. 02-0826PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETTESHEIM, PJ.

¶ 1. Daniel G. and Joan E. Paulin appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Gerald F. and Carol Ann Weiland. The Paulins purchased a lot in a subdivision developed by the Weilands. The Weilands commenced this action against the Pau-lins for erecting a manufactured structure on their lot in violation of the Declaration of Restrictions governing the subdivision. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Weilands, permanently enjoining the Paulins from placing a manufactured structure on their lot and ordering them to remove or raze the structure already existing.

¶…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. McKinnon v. BenedictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Zinda v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  4. State v. SmytheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Aspen Services, Inc. v. IT Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Solowicz v. Forward Geneva National, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Howell v. DenomieWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Solowicz v. Forward Geneva National, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API