Howell v. Denomie
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPatience Drake Roggensack, J.
¶ 1. Or-rin and Helen Denomie seek review of an unpublished court of appeals summary order 1 affirming a circuit court judgment finding the Denomies' answer and counterclaim frivolous and awarding Gary Howell attorney fees. The Denomies also seek review of the court of appeals conclusion that their appeal was frivolous. We conclude that the circuit court correctly determined that the Denomies' answer and counterclaim were frivolous, but that the court of appeals should not have concluded that the appeal was frivolous without first giving the parties and counsel a chance to be heard on that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rabideau v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Sommer v. CarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Stern v. Thompson & Coates, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Riley v. IsaacsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- J.J. Andrews, Inc. v. MidlandCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Aon Risk Services, Inc. v. LiebensteinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Larry v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- Berkos v. Shipwreck Bay Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- Townsend v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- Ivancevic v. ReaganCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.