Hill v. Wand
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Shawnee District Court. All the material facts are stated in the opinion. Judgment for plaintiff, Wand, at the September term, 1888. The defendants, Hill Bros., bring the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Strang, C.:
Action for damages. The petition alleges that in June, 1886, John Wand was a druggist, with a stock of goods, in possession of the store rooms on lot 213 on Kansas avenue, Topeka, as the tenant of Allen Sells, owner of the Windsor hotel building, said store rooms being a part of said building; that at the same time the plaintiffs, Hill Brothers, as partners, were in possession of the Windsor hotel under a five-year lease from said Allen Sells; that the plaintiffs represented to the defendant, John Wand, that they also had a lease of the store rooms occupied by him,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Wood v. . SeelyNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Anderson v. ArmsteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Parker v. CrittendenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
- Timon v. WhiteheadTexas Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Humbarger v. HumbargerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Kaufmann v. DrexelNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Morrison Bros. v. WellsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- State ex rel. Warnick v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.