Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Warnick v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1947No. 36,712PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The appeal in.this case is from a judgment fixing a fine and punishment for indirect contempt arising by reason of the alleged violation of an injunction which prohibited the accused from practicing medicine and surgery. The indirect contempt proceedings were brought pursuant to G. ,S. 1935, 20-1204.

The first question presented is whether the word “thereupon” in the above-cited statute requires that when a defendant is cited to show cause why he. should not be accused and tried for contempt it is necessary, at the time the defendant appears…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Howat v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Dewey v. LinscottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  5. Holloway v. Peoples Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Small v. SmallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. JOSLIN DRY GOODS COMPANY v. Villa Italia, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API