Faulconer v. Warner
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Bpohane Cou/nty. Motion by appellees to strike statement of facts from the record, and to affirm the judgment, because said statement is not certified as a statement of facts by any officer authorized to certify the same.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoyt, J.
— The statement of facts to support the appeal in this case was settled by the judge who tried the same after he had gone out of office, and his successor had assumed the duties thereof. For this, among other reasons, respondents move the court to strike such statement, and affirm the judgment of the court below. Our statute in relation to this matter provides that such statement shall be settled by the court or judge who tried the cause. Hoes this provision authorize the settlement of such statement by a private individual simply because at…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ketcham v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Smith v. BaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hallam v. TillinghastWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Enos v. WilcoxWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Northern Pacific & Puget Sound Shore Railroad v. ColemanWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Patterson v. YanceyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Gunderson v. CochraneWashington Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.