Legal Opinion

Northern Pacific & Puget Sound Shore Railroad v. Coleman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1891No. 209PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Superior Cou/rt, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

The respondents move to dismiss the appeal in this case, because the judge who tried the cause settled the statement of facts after he had gone out of office. We have heretofore decided, in the case of Faulconer v. Warner, 2 Wash. 525 (27 Pac. Rep. 274), that an ex-judge has no authority to settle the statement of facts, and we granted a motion to strike the statement in that case, for that reason. Here the respondents have not asked to have the statement stricken, but to have the appeal dismissed. It, of itself, affords no ground for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foreman v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Faulconer v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. CarcioneOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Seattle & Montana Railroad v. RoederWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Enoch v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Schmidt v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Spokane Falls & N. Ry. Co. v. ZieglerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API